{"id":10351,"date":"2021-12-06T14:27:23","date_gmt":"2021-12-06T13:27:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/active-coating.com\/?page_id=10351"},"modified":"2021-12-06T14:27:24","modified_gmt":"2021-12-06T13:27:24","slug":"sustainability","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/active-coating.com\/en\/sustainability\/","title":{"rendered":"Sustainability"},"content":{"rendered":"

APPLICATION EXAMPLE<\/h1>\n<\/div><\/div>
\n
\n
\n
\n

With 1 litre of ACTIVE<\/span> COATING<\/span> PURb<\/span>cAIR<\/span>, you can effectively coat a window area of around 3,000 m\u00b2. This supplies a room area of approx. 24,000 m\u00b2 with clean and healthy air.<\/p>\n

For rooms in schools, day care centres, kindergartens, offices, hotels and restaurants, a ratio of 5<\/span>m\u00b2\u00a0<\/span>room area to 1m\u00b2\u00a0<\/span>coated glass is recommended \u2013 i.e. around 15,000m\u00b2\u00a0<\/span>with 1 litre.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n

A Trotec HEPA device can supply an area of 80 m\u00b2 with fresh air. 188 devices are required and an investment of around \u20ac375,000 plus 19% VAT in order to supply a room area of 15,000 m\u00b2 with healthy breathable air. The investment sum for ACTIVE<\/span> COATING<\/span> PURb<\/span>cAIR<\/span> is about the same. This can coat 3,000 m\u00b2 of window glass.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n

For a room area of 8 m\u00b2 and a room height of 2.5 metres, there should be a coated glass area of 1 m\u00b2.\u00a0In this example, one litre of PURb<\/span>cAIR<\/span> would still supply an area of approx. 15,000 \u00a0m\u00b2 with healthy breathable air.<\/p>\n

188 filter devices have to be produced with high energy expenditure and high CO2<\/sub> emissions.\u00a0In addition, valuable raw materials and high-quality materials such as plastics, metals, circuit boards, elements for producing filters, copper cables and many more are consumed.<\/p>\n

One filter device requires 0.75 KWh electricity for operation. 188 devices consume 141 KW electricity per hour. If these devices are in operation for 8 hours, they consume 1,128 KWh each day. This costs (calculated according to lower electricity costs in Austria) around 214 euros.<\/p>\n

Per day, 8 hours of filtering, commercial electricity cost calculation (commercial is cheaper) results in electricity costs of about \u20ac78,000 per year.<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

If the electricity is not drawn from renewable energy sources, these devices emit immense amounts of CO2<\/sub> emissions.<\/p>\n

Due to the high connected loads of the devices, there is the risk that the power grids in schools, day care centres and kindergartens will not allow for widespread use, not to mention the consumption and costs of filters.<\/p>\n

Two filters are used in each device: a pre-filter for around \u20ac33 plus 19% VAT and a H14 high-performance filter according to EN1822 for around \u20ac235 plus 19% VAT.<\/p>\n

The filters need to be replaced twice a year. There would be annual follow-up costs here of around \u20ac100,990 plus 19% VAT for filter replacement. Plus the costs of working time for replacement.<\/span><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>

COMPARISON \u201cActive Coating\u201d to HEPA & UVC filter systems <\/span><\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div>
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n\u201eActive Coating\u201c\u00a0<\/strong>
\n<\/span><\/td>\n		HEPA filter systems<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\nUVC
\nfilter systems
\n<\/span><\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Removal of all relevant harmful substances<\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maintenance & service expense (e.g. filter replacement)<\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Operating costs (such as electricity etc.)<\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Operating noise<\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Space requirements<\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Extremely high CO2<\/sub> emissions<\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Use of resources<\/td>\nlow<\/span><\/td>\nhigh<\/span><\/td>\nhigh<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Production of hazardous waste (filter)<\/td>\nno<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\nyes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>

PUR<\/span>b<\/span>c<\/span>AIR<\/span>, HEPA & UVC filter systems<\/h2>\n<\/div><\/div>

Cost comparison in \u20ac (5-year view)<\/h3>\n<\/div><\/div>